Wrapper Architecture as Coordination Device: Multiple Equilibria in Autonomous-Agent Organizations
Author
Ian Staley
Abstract
Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and AI-agent systems combine cryptographic execution with blockchain-based governance, yet observed organizations almost universally com- bine these mechanisms with a conventional legal entity, a foundation, statutory DAO form, or limited liability wrapper. I develop a stylized model in which token-holders jointly determine wrapper choice and governance concentration, generating multiple equilibria: an inefficient trap in which the wrapper coalition cannot form because no holder will absorb the front-loaded fixed cost alone, and an efficient wrapper equilibrium in which the coalition reaches scale and amortizes fixed costs effectively. The trap is an empirically grounded coordination problem rather than an analytical artifact, and a global-games selection argument identifies the threshold at which insti- tutional design tips the system between equilibria. The framework reframes the CFTC v. Ooki DAO ruling, the Wyoming DAO LLC and DUNA statutes, and AI legal personhood debates as questions of equilibrium selection rather than of substantive cost allocation, and bounds the “Coasean singularity” claim that AI agents dramatically reduce transaction frictions.
Keywords
decentralized autonomous organizations; AI agents; coordination; multiple equilibria; organizational design; blockchain finance
Full Text:
References
- Allen, J. G. (2021). Bodies without organs: Law, economics, and decentralised governance. Stanford Journal of Blockchain Law & Policy, 4(1), 53-78.
- Appel, I., & Grennan, J. (2023). Control of decentralized autonomous organizations. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 113, 182-185. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20231119
- Carlsson, H., & van Damme, E. (1993). Global games and equilibrium selection. Econometrica, 61(5), 989-1018.
- Chan, A., Wei, K., Huang, S., Rajkumar, N., Perrier, E., Lazar, S., Hadfield, G. K., & Anderljung, M. (2025). Infrastructure for AI agents. Transactions on Machine Learning Research. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.10114
- Chen, J., Elliott, M., & Koh, A. (2023). Capability accumulation and conglomeratization in the information age. Journal of Economic Theory, 210, 105647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2023.105647
- Cohen, M. K., Kolt, N., Bengio, Y., Hadfield, G. K., & Russell, S. (2024). Regulating advanced artificial agents. Science, 384(6691), 36-38. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adl0625
- Cong, L. W., & He, Z. (2019). Blockchain disruption and smart contracts. Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1754-1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz007
- Daian, P., Goldfeder, S., Kell, T., Li, Y., Zhao, X., Bentov, I., Breidenbach, L., & Juels, A. (2020). Flash boys 2.0: Frontrunning in decentralized exchanges, miner extractable value, and consensus instability. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P)(pp. 910-927). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP40000.2020.00040
- Davidson, S. (2025). The nature of the decentralised autonomous organisation. Journal of Institutional Economics, 21, e5, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137424000341
- De Filippi, P., Reijers, W., & Mannan, M. (2024). Blockchain governance(The MIT Press Essential Knowledge Series). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14994.001.0001
- Frankel, D. M., Morris, S., & Pauzner, A. (2003). Equilibrium selection in global games with strategic complementarities. Journal of Economic Theory, 108(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0531(02)00018-2
- Fritsch, R., Müller, M., & Wattenhofer, R. (2024). Analyzing voting power in decentralized governance: Who controls DAOs? Blockchain: Research and Applications, 5(3), 100208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2024.100208
- Goldstein, I., & Pauzner, A. (2005). Demand-deposit contracts and the probability of bank runs. Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1293-1327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00762.x
- Grant, D. M., Kirby, E. M., & Hawkins, S. (2024). Decentralized autonomous organizations: To statutorily organize or not? Wyoming Law Review, 24(1), 59-103. https://doi.org/10.59643/1942-9916.1497
- Han, J., Lee, J., & Li, T. (2025). A review of DAO governance: Recent literature and emerging trends. Journal of Corporate Finance, 91, 102734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2025.102734
- John, K., Kogan, L., & Saleh, F. (2023). Smart contracts and decentralized finance. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 15, 523-542. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-110921-022806
- Kitzler, S., Paquet-Clouston, M., & Haslhofer, B. (2025). The economic impact of DeFi crime events on decentralized autonomous organizations. Journal of Finance and Data Science, 11, 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfds.2025.100171
- Lehar, A., & Parlour, C. A. (2025). Decentralized exchange: The Uniswap automated market maker. Journal of Finance, 80(1), 321-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13405
- Morris, S., & Shin, H. S. (1998). Unique equilibrium in a model of self-fulfilling currency attacks. American Economic Review, 88(3), 587-597.
- Novelli, C., Floridi, L., Sartor, G., & Teubner, G. (2025). AI as legal persons: Past, patterns, and prospects. Journal of Law and Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.70021
- Qin, K., Zhou, L., Livshits, B., & Gervais, A. (2021). Attacking the DeFi ecosystem with flash loans for fun and profit. In Financial Cryptography and Data Security 2021(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 12674, pp. 3-32). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64322-8_1
- Shahidi, P., Rusak, G., Manning, B. S., Fradkin, A., & Horton, J. J. (2025). The Coasean singularity? Demand, supply, and market design with AI agents(NBER Working Paper No. 34468). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Sun, X., Stasinakis, C., & Sermpinis, G. (2024). Decentralization illusion in DeFi: Evidence from tokenized voting in MakerDAO polls. Journal of Financial Stability, 73, 101286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101286
- Zhou, L., Xiong, X., Ernstberger, J., Chaliasos, S., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Qin, K., Wattenhofer, R., Song, D., & Gervais, A. (2023). SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi) attacks. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P)(pp. 2444-2461). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP46215.2023.10179435