Pruning as Rendering: A Decoherent-Histories Reformulation of the Observer-Rendering Criterion in Simulation-Theoretic Quantum Mechanics
Author
Ian Staley
Abstract
This paper develops a formal reconstruction, within the Gell-Mann-Hartle decoherent-histories framework, of the Campbell-Owhadi observer-rendering criterion familiar from simulation-theoretic quantum mechanics. Under an explicit records-theoretic reading of “information available to an observer,” the rendering criterion corresponds to a decoherence-functional condition weighted by algorithmic-information distance on observer records. The construction is metaphysically neutral: the parameter K may equally be read as a literal simulator budget or as a resource bound on observer-internal record consolidation. The author defines a pruning admissibility functional A(α | O, K) and establishes a correspondence in which Campbell-Owhadi rendering events coincide with transitions across the pruning-admissibility boundary. The framework recovers standard decoherent-histories statistics (Born rule, medium decoherence) in the limit K → ∞. For finite K, a heuristic derivation yields a complementary-error-function form, saturating at the contextuality and Bell margin, for the predicted sub-Tsirelson and sub-Klyachko-Can-Binicioğlu-Shumovsky deviations and for the threshold structure in delayed-choice eraser visibility. Two photonic protocols on existing single-photon platforms are proposed, at estimated costs of approximately $180k each in an existing facility or $200-400k from scratch.
Keywords
decoherent histories; simulation hypothesis; algorithmic information; quantum contextuality; observer rendering
Full Text:
References
Adlam, E., & Rovelli, C. (2023). Information is physical: Cross-perspective links in relational quantum mechanics. Philosophy of Physics, 1(1), Article 4, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.31389/pop.8
Bauwens, B., & Shen, A. (2020). Information distance revisited. In 37th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2020) (Vol. 154, Article 46). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2020.46
Beane, S. R., Davoudi, Z., & Savage, M. J. (2014). Constraints on the universe as a numerical simulation. The European Physical Journal A, 50(9), Article 148. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2014-14148-0
Bennett, C. H., Gács, P., Li, M., Vitányi, P. M. B., & Zurek, W. H. (1998). Information distance. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 44(4), 1407-1423. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.681318
Birch, J. (2013). On the “simulation argument” and selective scepticism. Erkenntnis, 78(1), 95-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-012-9400-9
Bostrom, N. (2003). Are we living in a computer simulation? The Philosophical Quarterly, 53(211), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00309
Bousso, R., & Susskind, L. (2012). Multiverse interpretation of quantum mechanics. Physical Review D, 85(4), Article 045007. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.045007
Brukner, Č. (2018). A no-go theorem for observer-independent facts. Entropy, 20(5), Article 350. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20050350
Cabello, A. (2008). Experimentally testable state-independent quantum contextuality. Physical Review Letters, 101(21), Article 210401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.210401
Campbell, T., Owhadi, H., Sauvageau, J., & Watkinson, D. (2017). On testing the simulation theory. International Journal of Quantum Foundations, 3(3), 78-99. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.00058
Cavalcanti, E. G., Di Biagio, A., & Rovelli, C. (2023). On the consistency of relative facts. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 13(4), Article 55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-023-00551-8
Chaitin, G. J. (1975). A theory of program size formally identical to information theory. Journal of the ACM, 22(3), 329-340. https://doi.org/10.1145/321892.321894
Chalmers, D. J. (2022). Reality+: Virtual worlds and the problems of philosophy. W. W. Norton.
Cilibrasi, R., & Vitányi, P. M. B. (2005). Clustering by compression. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 51(4), 1523-1545. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2005.844059
Cirel'son, B. S. (1980). Quantum generalizations of Bell's inequality. Letters in Mathematical Physics, 4(2), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00417500
Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., & Holt, R. A. (1969). Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Physical Review Letters, 23(15), 880-884. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880
D'Ambrosio, V., Herbauts, I., Amselem, E., Nagali, E., Bourennane, M., Sciarrino, F., & Cabello, A. (2013). Experimental implementation of a Kochen-Specker set of quantum tests. Physical Review X, 3(1), Article 011012. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.3.011012
DeBrota, J. B., Fuchs, C. A., & Schack, R. (2020). Respecting one's fellow: QBism's analysis of Wigner's friend. Foundations of Physics, 50(12), 1859-1874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-020-00369-x
Deutsch, D. (1997). The fabric of reality. Penguin.
DeWitt, B. S., & Graham, N. (Eds.). (1973). The many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. Princeton University Press.
Di Biagio, A., & Rovelli, C. (2021). Stable facts, relative facts. Foundations of Physics, 51(1), Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00429-w
Diósi, L. (2004). Anomalies of weakened decoherence criteria for quantum histories. Physical Review Letters, 92(17), Article 170401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.170401
Dowker, H. F., & Kent, A. (1996). On the consistent histories approach to quantum mechanics. Journal of Statistical Physics, 82(5-6), 1575-1646. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02183396
Everett, H., III. (1957). “Relative state” formulation of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 29(3), 454-462. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.29.454
Frauchiger, D., & Renner, R. (2018). Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself. Nature Communications, 9, Article 3711. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05739-8
Fuchs, C. A. (2017). On participatory realism. In I. T. Durham & D. Rickles (Eds.), Information and interaction: Eddington, Wheeler, and the limits of knowledge (pp. 113-134). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43760-6_7
Gell-Mann, M., & Hartle, J. B. (1990). Quantum mechanics in the light of quantum cosmology. In W. H. Zurek (Ed.), Complexity, entropy, and the physics of information (pp. 425-458). Addison-Wesley.
Gell-Mann, M., & Hartle, J. B. (1993). Classical equations for quantum systems. Physical Review D, 47(8), 3345-3382. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.47.3345
Gell-Mann, M., & Hartle, J. B. (1998). Strong decoherence. In D.-H. Feng & B.-L. Hu (Eds.), Quantum-classical correspondence: Proceedings of the 4th Drexel Symposium on Quantum Non-Integrability (pp. 3-35). International Press. https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9509054
Gorard, J. (2020a). Some quantum mechanical properties of the Wolfram model. Complex Systems, 29(2), 537-598. https://doi.org/10.25088/ComplexSystems.29.2.537
Gorard, J. (2020b). Some relativistic and gravitational properties of the Wolfram model. Complex Systems, 29(2), 599-654. https://doi.org/10.25088/ComplexSystems.29.2.599
Gorard, J. (2021). Algorithmic causal sets and the Wolfram model. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.03460
Griffiths, R. B. (1984). Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics. Journal of Statistical Physics, 36(1-2), 219-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01015734
Halliwell, J. J. (1999a). Decoherent histories and the emergent classicality of local densities. Physical Review Letters, 83(13), 2481-2485. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.2481
Halliwell, J. J. (1999b). Somewhere in the universe: Where is the information stored when histories decohere? Physical Review D, 60(10), Article 105031. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.105031
Hartle, J. B. (2011). The quasiclassical realms of this quantum universe. Foundations of Physics, 41(6), 982-1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-010-9460-0
Indset, A., Neukart, F., Pflitsch, M., & Perelshtein, M. R. (2024). Are we living in a (quantum) simulation? Constraints, observations, and experiments on the simulation hypothesis. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04018
Isham, C. J. (1994). Quantum logic and the histories approach to quantum theory. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 35(5), 2157-2185. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.530544
Kim, Y.-H., Yu, R., Kulik, S. P., Shih, Y., & Scully, M. O. (2000). Delayed “choice” quantum eraser. Physical Review Letters, 84(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1
Kipping, D. (2020). A Bayesian approach to the simulation argument. Universe, 6(8), Article 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe6080109
Klyachko, A. A., Can, M. A., Binicioğlu, S., & Shumovsky, A. S. (2008). Simple test for hidden variables in spin-1 systems. Physical Review Letters, 101(2), Article 020403. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.020403
Kochen, S., & Specker, E. P. (1967). The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 17(1), 59-87.
Landauer, R. (1961). Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 5(3), 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.53.0183
Łapkiewicz, R., Li, P., Schaeff, C., Langford, N. K., Ramelow, S., Wieśniak, M., & Zeilinger, A. (2011). Experimental non-classicality of an indivisible quantum system. Nature, 474(7352), 490-493. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10119
Levin, L. A. (1973). Universal sequential search problems. Problems of Information Transmission, 9(3), 265-266.
Li, M., & Vitányi, P. (2019). An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity and its applications (4th ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11298-1
Lloyd, S. (2002). Computational capacity of the universe. Physical Review Letters, 88(23), Article 237901. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.237901
Masanes, L., Galley, T. D., & Müller, M. P. (2019). The measurement postulates of quantum mechanics are operationally redundant. Nature Communications, 10, Article 1361. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09348-x
Müller, M. P. (2017). Could the physical world be emergent instead of fundamental, and why should we ask? arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.01826
Müller, M. P. (2020). Law without law: From observer states to physics via algorithmic information theory. Quantum, 4, Article 301. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-07-20-301
Müller, M. P. (2021). Probabilistic theories and reconstructions of quantum theory (Les Houches 2019 lecture notes). SciPost Physics Lecture Notes, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.28
Navascués, M., Pironio, S., & Acín, A. (2008). A convergent hierarchy of semidefinite programs characterizing the set of quantum correlations. New Journal of Physics, 10, Article 073013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/10/7/073013
Omnès, R. (1988). Logical reformulation of quantum mechanics. I. Foundations. Journal of Statistical Physics, 53(3-4), 893-932. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014230
Pienaar, J. (2021a). QBism and relational quantum mechanics compared. Foundations of Physics, 51(5), Article 96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00501-5
Pienaar, J. (2021b). A quintet of quandaries: Five no-go theorems for relational quantum mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 51(5), Article 97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00500-6
Rovelli, C. (1996). Relational quantum mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35(8), 1637-1678. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02302261
Scully, M. O., & Drühl, K. (1982). Quantum eraser: A proposed photon correlation experiment concerning observation and “delayed choice” in quantum mechanics. Physical Review A, 25(4), 2208-2213. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.25.2208
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
Solomonoff, R. J. (1964). A formal theory of inductive inference. Part I. Information and Control, 7(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(64)90223-2
Staley, I. (2026a). Final-state constraints and informational pruning in quantum histories. International Journal of Quantum Foundations, 12(2), 719-737. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19512844
Staley, I. (2026b). Pruned histories and the computational multiverse [Preprint].
Tegmark, M. (2008). The mathematical universe. Foundations of Physics, 38(2), 101-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-007-9186-9
Vopson, M. M. (2023). The second law of infodynamics and its implications for the simulated universe hypothesis. AIP Advances, 13(10), Article 105308. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0173278
Vopson, M. M., & Lepadatu, S. (2022). Second law of information dynamics. AIP Advances, 12(7), Article 075310. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0100358
Walborn, S. P., Terra Cunha, M. O., Pádua, S., & Monken, C. H. (2002). Double-slit quantum eraser. Physical Review A, 65(3), Article 033818. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.033818
Wallace, D. (2012). The emergent multiverse: Quantum theory according to the Everett interpretation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546961.001.0001
Whitworth, B. (2007). The physical world as a virtual reality (CDMTCS Research Report No. 316). Centre for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, University of Auckland. https://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0337
Wolfram, S. (2020). A class of models with the potential to represent fundamental physics. Complex Systems, 29(2), 107-536. https://doi.org/10.25088/ComplexSystems.29.2.107
Zurek, W. H. (2003). Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75(3), 715-775. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715