Optimizing Vessel Utilization and Route Planning Strategies in Maritime Logistics: An Empirical Analysis of Operational Efficiencies in Chennai

Author

Suhail H, Dr. Sindhura Kannappan

Abstract

  This study investigates the critical operational factors influencing vessel capacity utilization, route planning effectiveness, and turnaround performance within the maritime logistics hub of Chennai. Against the backdrop of global trade pressures, port congestion, and environmental regulations, the research analyzes primary operational data across key dimensions, including route planning methodologies, import-export cargo imbalances, digital system adoption, and customer satisfaction. Employing descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, Spearman rank correlation, Chi-Square tests of independence, and Kruskal-Wallis tests, the findings reveal that while perceived planning effectiveness does not directly correlate with utilization, the specific planning method utilized (manual, software, or hybrid) significantly impacts capacity outcomes. Furthermore, port congestion and cargo imbalances negatively constrain operational efficiency by extending turnaround times and reducing utilization. Digital system effectiveness emerged as a vital driver for on-time delivery (OTD) improvements, despite often reflecting reactive adoption patterns. Finally, the empirical evidence confirms that structured, outcome-driven improvement initiatives are strongly associated with higher customer satisfaction.

Keywords

Maritime Logistics, Vessel Utilization, Route Planning, Port Congestion

Full Text:

Download Paper PDF

References

• Chen, H., & Xu, Z. (2023). Optimization of ship routing and allocation in a container transport network considering port congestion: A variational inequality model. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 178, Article 103266.
• Chu, Z., Yan, R., & Wang, S. (2024). Vessel turnaround time prediction: A machine learning approach. Ocean & Coastal Management, 248, Article 106953.
• Kang, L., Wu, W., Yu, H., & Su, F. (2022).  Global container port network linkages and topology in 2021. Sensors, 22(15), 5889.
• Lashgari, M., Akbari, A. A., & Nasersarraf, S. (2021). A new model for simultaneously optimizing ship route, sailing speed, and fuel consumption in a shipping problem under different price scenarios. Applied Ocean Research, 113, Article 102725.
• Liu, S., & Hu, W. (2024). Shipping map: An innovative method in grid generation of global maritime network for automatic vessel route planning using AIS data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 171, Article 104920.
• Ma, D., Ma, W., Jin, S., & Ma, X. (2020). Method for simultaneously optimizing ship route and speed with emission control areas. Ocean Engineering, 202, Article 107170.
• Mollaoglu, M., Altay, B. C., & Balin, A. (2023). Bibliometric review of route optimization  in  maritime  transportation:  Environmental  sustainability  and  operational efficiency.  Transportation  Research  Record:  Journal  of  the  Transportation  Research Board, 2677(4), 321–338.
• Sun, X., Zheng, S., & Qi, J. (2023). Integrated planning of feeder route selection, schedule design, and fleet allocation with multimodal transport path selection considered. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(7), 1445.
• Tran, N. K., & Haasis, H. D. (2015). Literature survey of network optimization in container liner shipping.  Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 27(2–3), 139–179.
• Vakili, S., Ballini, F., Schönborn, A., Christodoulou, A., Dalaklis, D., & Ölçer, A. I. (2023). Assessing the macroeconomic and social impacts of slow steaming in shipping: A literature review on small island developing states and least developed countries. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 8(1), Article 4.
• Wang, H., Lang, X., & Mao, W. (2021). Voyage optimization combining genetic algorithm and dynamic programming for fuel/emissions reduction. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 90, Article 102670.
• Wang, S., Zhuge, D., Zhen, L., & Lee, C. Y. (2021). Liner shipping service planning under sulfur emission regulations. Transportation Science, 55(2), 491–509.
• Wu, Y., Huang, Y., Wang, H., & Zhen, L. (2023). Nonlinear programming for fleet deployment, voyage planning and speed optimization in sustainable liner shipping. Electronic Research Archive, 31(1), 147–168.
• Xia, J., Li, K. X., Ma, H., & Xu, Z. (2015). Joint planning of fleet deployment, speed optimization, and cargo allocation for liner shipping. Transportation Science, 49(4), 922–938.
• Xin, X., Wang, X., Zhang, T., Chen, H., Guo, Q., & Zhou, S. (2023). Liner alliance shipping network design model with shippers' choice inertia and empty container relocation. Electronic Research Archive, 31(9), 5509–5540.
• Yang, D., Wu, L., Wang, S., Jia, H., & Li, K. X. (2019). How big data enriches maritime research. Transport Reviews, 39(6), 727–745.
• Zhang, J., Chen, Y., & Zhao, J. (2024). Vessel trajectory prediction based on AIS data: Dual-path spatial–temporal attention network with multi-attribute information. Journal

of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(11), 2031.

• Zhao, Z., Peng, Z., Zhou, J., & Ma, Y. (2025). Toward green container liner shipping: Joint optimization of heterogeneous fleet deployment, speed optimization, and fuel bunkering. International Transactions in Operational Research, 32(3), 1421–1455.
• Zheng, J., Mao, C., & Zhang, Q. (2023). Hybrid dynamic modeling and receding horizon speed optimization for liner shipping operations from schedule reliability and energy efficiency perspectives. Frontiers in Marine Science, 10, Article 1095283.
• Zhuge, D., Wang, S., & Wang, D. Z. W. (2021).  A joint liner ship path, speed, and deployment problem under emission reduction measures. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 144, 155–173.