International Journal of Advance Research Publication and Reviews

International Journal of Advance Research Publication and Reviews
Peer-Reviewed | Multi-Disciplinary Journal

ISSN: 3049-0103 (O)

Impact Factor: 4.33

Political Deepfakes and the Burden of Verification in Malaysia

Author

Wang Xunzhi, Mohd Haizra Hashim

Abstract

 A convincing political forgery can be taken as evidence, and the possibility of forgery can make a genuine recording easier to dispute. This article examines who should bear the work of verifying disputed political media in Malaysia. It draws on published studies of deepfake detection, public attitudes and video campaigning, then applies deontological ethics, consequentialism and virtue ethics to an illustrative case. A viewer has two questions to resolve. Is the recording authentic, and does it support the claim attached to it? A label can tell viewers how material was made, but it cannot answer both questions. Campaigns are best placed to disclose alterations and retain source files. Platforms and newsrooms can keep that information visible, investigate disputed claims and correct errors in the languages in which those claims circulate. These duties should reflect each actor’s access to evidence and leave room for legitimate satire and criticism.


Keywords

political deepfakes, media ethics, verification, political communication, Malaysia

Full Text:

Download Paper PDF

References

  • A Sabri, F. A. (2024). Narrative review on detonation of AI-generated deep fakes and misinformation: A threat to politicians in Malaysia. e-Journal of Media and Society, 7(2), 71–88. https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/97612/
  • Clark, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2026). The continued influence of AI-generated deepfake videos despite transparency warnings. Communications Psychology, 4, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00381-9
  • Groh, M., Sankaranarayanan, A., Singh, N., Kim, D. Y., Lippman, A., & Picard, R. (2024). Human detection of political speech deepfakes across transcripts, audio, and video. Nature Communications, 15, Article 7629. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51998-z
  • Hursthouse, R., & Pettigrove, G. (2023). Virtue ethics. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy(Fall 2023 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/ethics-virtue/
  • Neyazi, T. A., Nadaf, A. H., Tan, K. E., & Schroeder, R. (2024). Does trust in government moderate the perception towards deepfakes? Comparative perspectives from Asia on the risks of AI and misinformation for democracy. Government Information Quarterly, 41(4), Article 101980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101980
  • Schiff, K. J., Schiff, D. S., & Bueno, N. S. (2025). The liar’s dividend: Can politicians claim misinformation to evade accountability? American Political Science Review, 119(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423001454
  • Tapsell, R. (2023). Social media and Malaysia’s 2022 election: The growth and impact of video campaigning. Pacific Affairs, 96(2), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.5509/2023962303
  • (2023). Guidelines for the governance of digital platforms: Safeguarding freedom of expression and access to information through a multistakeholder approach. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000387339
  • Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2020). Deepfakes and disinformation: Exploring the impact of synthetic political video on deception, uncertainty, and trust in news. Social Media + Society, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408
  • Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making(Council of Europe Report No. DGI(2017)09). Council of Europe. https://edoc.coe.int/en/media/7495-information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-research-and-policy-making.html
Top